Skip to content

ci: add review-only CodeBoarding workflow using action PR 120 - #1

Merged
ivanmilevtues merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
ci/codeboarding-review-pr-120
Sep 8, 2026
Merged

ci: add review-only CodeBoarding workflow using action PR 120#1
ivanmilevtues merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
ci/codeboarding-review-pr-120

Conversation

@ivanmilevtues

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Requested by @ivanmilevtues to exercise CodeBoarding/CodeBoarding-action#120.

Adds only a CodeBoarding review workflow referencing CodeBoarding/CodeBoarding-action@refs/pull/120/head, with explicit hosted authentication and depth_level: 3 to exercise non-default depth without requiring a provider secret.

No sync job, no committed .codeboarding state, and no changes to existing workflows. A separate PR after this workflow merges will test generating a missing merge-base baseline with full analysis, incrementally applying the PR head, then publishing reusable artifacts and the architecture diff.

Validation: YAML parsed, exactly one review job, correct PR ref/depth, and git diff --check.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review Completed 2026-09-08T16:24:03.258044Z a008da4 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Sep 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

CodeBoarding review

Status: 0 changed components

See the full change in CodeBoarding.

graph LR
    n_Catalog_and_Ordering_Backend_Services["Catalog and Ordering Backend Services"]
    n_Client_Mobile_Application["Client Mobile Application"]
    n_Basket_Payment_Webhooks_and_Service_Defaults["Basket, Payment, Webhooks, and Service Defaults"]
    n_Identity_and_Authentication_Service["Identity and Authentication Service"]
    n_Web_Frontend_and_Hybrid_Applications["Web Frontend and Hybrid Applications"]
    n_Event_Bus_and_Messaging_Infrastructure["Event Bus and Messaging Infrastructure"]
    n_Web_Client_UI_Scripts["Web Client UI Scripts"]
    n_Chatbot_Web_Component_Script["Chatbot Web Component Script"]
    n_Catalog_and_Ordering_Backend_Services -- "configures authentication using" --> n_Basket_Payment_Webhooks_and_Service_Defaults
    n_Catalog_and_Ordering_Backend_Services -- "persists events modeled by" --> n_Event_Bus_and_Messaging_Infrastructure
    n_Client_Mobile_Application -- "registers navigation route for" --> n_Basket_Payment_Webhooks_and_Service_Defaults
    n_Basket_Payment_Webhooks_and_Service_Defaults -- "updates mock dependencies on" --> n_Client_Mobile_Application
    n_Web_Frontend_and_Hybrid_Applications -- "reads configuration through" --> n_Basket_Payment_Webhooks_and_Service_Defaults
    classDef added fill:#1f883d,stroke:#0b5d23,color:#ffffff;
    classDef modified fill:#bf8700,stroke:#7d4e00,color:#ffffff;
    classDef deleted fill:#cf222e,stroke:#82071e,color:#ffffff,stroke-dasharray:5 3;
Loading

download artifacts · run 34250460231

@ivanmilevtues
ivanmilevtues merged commit 5ed5d92 into main Sep 8, 2026
3 of 4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants