Skip to content

[Service Bus] Prepare 7.18.0 for release - #50491

Draft
Eldert Grootenboer (EldertGrootenboer) wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
release/servicebus-ga-20260916-prep
Draft

Eldert Grootenboer (EldertGrootenboer) wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
release/servicebus-ga-20260916-prep

Conversation

@EldertGrootenboer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Problem

The five Azure Service Bus client libraries are still configured for
prerelease versions, and their release notes are split across preview
CHANGELOG entries.

Fix

Set each library to its stable GA version and consolidate the complete preview
line under a dated October 6, 2026 release entry.

Changes

  • eng/versioning/version_client.txt
  • sdk/servicebus/azure-messaging-servicebus/CHANGELOG.md
  • sdk/servicebus/azure-messaging-servicebus/README.md
  • sdk/servicebus/azure-messaging-servicebus/docs/pom.xml
  • sdk/servicebus/azure-messaging-servicebus/pom.xml

Cross-SDK alignment

SDK Status
Java Prepared for 7.18.0 GA
.NET Prepared for 7.21.0 GA
JavaScript Prepared for 7.10.0 GA
Go Prepared for 1.11.0 GA
Python Prepared for 7.15.0 GA

Testing

mvn test -f sdk/servicebus/azure-messaging-servicebus/pom.xml passed.

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines:
Successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).
35 pipeline(s) were filtered out due to trigger conditions.
There may be pipelines that require an authorized user to comment /azp run to run.

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🟡 Changes recommended

Stress and track2-perf modules still reference 7.18.0-beta.4 instead of the GA artifact.

Get a fresh assessment by requesting another Copilot review.

Pull request overview

Prepares the Azure Service Bus Java client for the 7.18.0 GA release.

Changes:

  • Updates version metadata, Maven files, and README references to 7.18.0.
  • Consolidates preview release notes into the October 6, 2026 changelog entry.
  • Stress and track2-perf modules still reference 7.18.0-beta.4.
File summaries
File Description
sdk/servicebus/azure-messaging-servicebus/README.md Updates the dependency example.
sdk/servicebus/azure-messaging-servicebus/pom.xml Sets the package version to GA.
sdk/servicebus/azure-messaging-servicebus/docs/pom.xml Updates the documentation dependency.
sdk/servicebus/azure-messaging-servicebus/CHANGELOG.md Consolidates preview notes into the GA entry.
eng/versioning/version_client.txt Updates the current Service Bus version.
Review details

Suppressed comments (1)

sdk/servicebus/azure-messaging-servicebus/pom.xml:17

  • This GA bump is not propagated to the two POMs that consume this artifact: azure-messaging-servicebus-stress/pom.xml:48 and azure-messaging-servicebus-track2-perf/pom.xml:26 still use 7.18.0-beta.4 under a current update marker. Since sdk/servicebus/ci.yml:56-62 builds the perf module as an additional module, those builds continue to validate against the prerelease instead of 7.18.0; update both dependency versions as part of this release.
  <version>7.18.0</version> <!-- {x-version-update;com.azure:azure-messaging-servicebus;current} -->
  • Files reviewed: 5/5 changed files
  • Comments generated: 1
  • Review effort level: Lite

💡 Add a code-review agent skill for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.

Comment thread eng/versioning/version_client.txt
- Use the 7.18.0 GA dependency in stress and perf modules

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🟡 Changes recommended

Unresolved review concerns remain before GA approval.

Get a fresh assessment by requesting another Copilot review.

Review details
  • Files reviewed: 7/7 changed files
  • Comments generated: 0 new
  • Review effort level: Lite

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants