diff --git a/.github/pull_request_template.md b/.github/pull_request_template.md
index d590bcb..7abea80 100644
--- a/.github/pull_request_template.md
+++ b/.github/pull_request_template.md
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Docs: <!-- "updated <files>" or "none, because ..." -->
 
 <!--
 When AGENTS.md requires independent review, add one line and leave the findings out:
-Review: <reviewer>, session <id>, <verdict>
+Review: <reviewer>, <verdict> (<rounds> rounds, <fixed> findings fixed)
 
 Add no agent attribution, such as a "Generated with" line.
 -->
diff --git a/AGENTS.md b/AGENTS.md
index 8e93495..70089af 100644
--- a/AGENTS.md
+++ b/AGENTS.md
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ handled-error recovery in `docs/errors.md`, publication mechanics in `RELEASING.
   exit statuses, `AGENTS.md`, `CLAUDE.md`, `CONTRIBUTING.md`, `RELEASING.md`, `.claude/settings.json`, or
   `.codex/config.toml` get an independent review through cross-review: `codex-review` from Claude Code,
   `$claude-review` from Codex. Pass the service repository's `docs/review-focus.md` as `--focus-file` (see
-  `CONTRIBUTING.md`). Put the reviewer, session id, and verdict in the pull request body, and leave the findings out.
+  `CONTRIBUTING.md`). Put the reviewer, verdict, and finding counts in the pull request body, not the findings.
 - `firstdraft plan compile` defaults to local output in the current directory. GitHub publication requires
   `--github`; Codespaces is a fallback. Keep Skill callers and recovery instructions aligned with this boundary.
 - The service repository coordinates releases and owns their approval and smoke policy. One approved coordinated
diff --git a/CONTRIBUTING.md b/CONTRIBUTING.md
index ba3373f..8fe5e49 100644
--- a/CONTRIBUTING.md
+++ b/CONTRIBUTING.md
@@ -40,8 +40,9 @@ that a bot such as Dependabot opens.
 The body also carries:
 
 - a summary of what changed and why; and
-- when [AGENTS.md](AGENTS.md) requires independent review, one line, `Review: <reviewer>, session <id>, <verdict>`,
-  with the findings left out.
+- when [AGENTS.md](AGENTS.md) requires independent review, one line with the reviewer, the verdict, and the counts,
+  such as `Review: Codex, approve (2 rounds, 3 findings fixed)`. Leave out session ids, which name files in a deleted
+  worktree, and the findings themselves; give a material finding one line in the commit message.
 
 Use GitHub closing keywords only for completed Issues: even `does not close #123` closes #123. Say the remainder is
 tracked in open Issue #123 instead. The [pull request template](.github/pull_request_template.md) holds these fields.