[expr.prim.id.qual]/9 “member” from nowhere

[BlowingWind314]

[expr.prim.id.qual]/9 says

The result is an lvalue if the member is
(9.1) a function other than a non-static member function,
(9.2) a non-static member function if Q is the operand of a unary & operator,
(9.3) a variable,
(9.4) a structured binding ([dcl.struct.bind]), or
(9.5) a data member,
and a prvalue otherwise.

What does the "member" refer to? Probably, see [expr.prim.id.qual]/6

The result of a qualified-id Q is the entity it denotes ([basic.lookup.qual]).

so it may be

The result is an lvalue if the mamber entity is ...

[frederick-vs-ja]

Looks like a mistake in P1787R6. This paragraph used to talk about class members, but it covers other entities now.

[eisenwave]

@jensmaurer Can we consider this a typo or is this a CWG issue thing?

Interestingly, the use of "member" goes back all the way to R0 of the paper, so I couldn't find clear evidence that this is just a slip-up between revisions or so.