Skip to content

Standard for surface level prefix/suffix? #150

Description

@svahl991

I think we've discussed this before, but I didn't find an official issue. Apologies if I missed it.

I believe the ESM standard is to use the suffix _at_surface for surface variables, which departs from CF naming, which often uses a surface_ prefix. But some ESM names still seem to carry the CF name. For example, air_pressure_at_surface is listed right above surface_pressure_of_dry_air:

* `air_pressure_at_surface`: Air pressure at local surface
* `real(kind=kind_phys)`: units = Pa
* `surface_pressure_of_dry_air`: Surface pressure of dry air

Is the plan to do a "bug smash' sometime to bring ESM into consistency on this? Is there a timeline for this effort? Or is this likely to be the case for a while? For new names being added, the plan is to enforce the _at_surface suffix?

Thanks.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions